Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vilket tåg från vilket spår?: En balansakt mellan snabba byten, enkel tågklarering och effektivt kapacitetsutnyttjande
Division of Transport Planning, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden .ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2654-8173
Communications and Transport Systems, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6880-8549
2024 (Swedish)In: Sammanställning av referat från Transportforum 2024 / [ed] Fredrik Hellman; Mattias Haraldsson, Linköping: Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut , 2024, p. 112-113Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Changing trains is a crucial part of many rail journeys. It is essential for reaching all destinations, but it takes time and is often stressful, especially when the arriving train is delayed. In models for cost-benefit analyses, interchange time for the railway is typically considered 2-3 times more expensive than in-vehicle time. Designing and operating railway stations in a way that could minimise the required interchange time is therefore vital for making rail travel attractive. This study addresses the problem of using the platform tracks in the best way, balancing crossing train paths with easy interchanges across the same platform. Primarily, we look at the problem on a tactical level, i.e., timetable planning, but the insights are also useful on a strategic level for designing and re-designing railway stations, and on an operational level, doing the dispatching. 

This study explores principal differences when prioritising a few crossing train paths versus fast interchanges, using simple, ideal principles for allocating trains to platform tracks in RailSys. These principles are using the track allocation from a given timetable, using the lowest numbered track that is free, and maximising train changes at the same platform. 

The analysis is performed for Norrköping station using the timetable of a normal Thursday in autumn 2021 and counting the number of possible connections between trains, here defined as a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 30 minutes between the arrival time of a train and the departure time of another train. To investigate the effects of the track allocation principles, the number of connections at the same platform and the number of connections with crossing train paths, i.e. to some extent use the same station infrastructure, have been counted. 

205 passenger trains with 1,033 possible connections were identified. Results show that capacity utilisation and the number of crossing train paths increase when the number of connections from the same platform is increased. Increasing the number of connections from the same platform increases crossing train paths and capacity utilisation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut , 2024. p. 112-113
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-20584OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-20584DiVA, id: diva2:1849941
Conference
Transportforum, Linköping, Sverige, 17-18 januari, 2024.
Available from: 2024-04-04 Created: 2024-04-09 Last updated: 2025-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Transportforum - abstracts. p. 112-113

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, IngridPeterson, Anders
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf