Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Framing the FRAM: A literature review on the functional resonance analysis method
Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Uppsala University, Sweden.
Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 129, p. 1-23, article id 104827Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The development of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) has been motivated by the perceived limitations of fundamentally deterministic and probabilistic approaches to understand complex systems’ behaviour. Congruent with the principles of Resilience Engineering, over recent years the FRAM has been progressively developed in scientific terms, and increasingly adopted in industrial environments with reportedly successful results. Nevertheless, a wide literature review focused on the method is currently lacking. On these premises, this paper aims to summarise all available published research in English about FRAM. More than 1700 documents from multiple scientific repositories were reviewed through a protocol based on the PRISMA review technique. The paper aims to uncover a number of characteristics of the FRAM research, both in terms of the method’s application and of the authors contributing to its development. The systematic analysis explores the method in terms of its methodological aspects, application domains, and enhancements in qualitative and quantitative terms, as well as proposing potential future research directions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2020. Vol. 129, p. 1-23, article id 104827
Keywords [en]
Systematic review; Complex systems; Socio-technical systems; Resilience engineering; Safety
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Shipping, Maritime Science; Design
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-17032DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104827ISI: 000541146200024Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85084939577OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-17032DiVA, id: diva2:1737621
Available from: 2023-02-17 Created: 2023-02-17 Last updated: 2025-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(17115 kB)256 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 17115 kBChecksum SHA-512
23b51fe563f2f3aafccd8e886ef7c3d2fe66d25fa9685612a010447353798be164c284766805c837ce1860049c131f0809267820f0e9991626ac0a7f92ad7904
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Praetorius, Gesa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Praetorius, Gesa
In the same journal
Safety Science
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 256 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 624 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf