Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Driving forces and constraints to sustainable household travel behaviour
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Society, environment and transport, Mobility, actors and planning processes.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6673-0079
Umeå University, Sweden.
Umeå University, Sweden.
2013 (English)In: Environmental Policy and Household Behaviour: Sustainability and Everyday Life / [ed] Patrik Soderholm, Taylor and Francis , 2013, 1, p. 211-236Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In many Western countries, the car is still the dominant travel mode for everyday travel. In the US there has been a dramatic increase (194 per cent) in vehicle trips and vehicle miles of travel from 1969 to 2001 (NHTS, 2001a). In the year 2001, 86 per cent of the number of trips and 88 per cent of the travelled miles were made by private vehicle (NHTS, 2001b). In Europe today, on average 70 per cent of the travel distance is made by car (Eurostat, 2007). The car is used for trips to work, to the store, to leisure activities, and to give others, such as children, a lift to different locations. Hence, the car is an integrated part of many peoples’ lives. However, traffic causes both local and large-scale environmental problems, such as noise, landscape fragmentation and different types of emissions (e.g. carbon dioxide CO2) (Trocmé et al, 2003; Miedema, 2007; Van Wee, 2007). Given that personal transportation is a significant contributor to environmental problems, the negative environmental effects of car use need to be reduced. Different policy measures may be implemented in order to encourage more sustainable travel behaviour. Three broad strategies are land management strategies, such as planning for more compact cities (Litman, 2008), technological improvements, such as developing cars fuelled by renewable fuel, and reducing the demand for car use through, for example increasing the cost for using cars and decreasing the cost for using alternative travel modes (Gärling et al, 2002). Although all three strategies are needed in order to achieve more sustainable travel behaviour, several researchers advocate that an immediate reduction in the negative environmental effects of transportation demands a change in travel behaviour (see e.g. Hickman and Banister, 2007).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor and Francis , 2013, 1. p. 211-236
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-19432DOI: 10.4324/9781315066004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85144097004ISBN: 9781134040063 (print)ISBN: 9781844078974 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-19432DiVA, id: diva2:1731082
Available from: 2023-01-26 Created: 2023-01-26 Last updated: 2025-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Eriksson, Louise

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Louise
By organisation
Mobility, actors and planning processes
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 152 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf