Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
All Change or Business as Usual?: the Discursive Framing of Digitalized Smart Accessibility in Sweden
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Society, environment and transport, Mobility, actors and planning processes.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8074-3634
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Society, environment and transport, Mobility, actors and planning processes.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6846-2381
KTH, Urbana och regionala studier.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3613-7039
2019 (English)In: Transportation Research Procedia, Elsevier BV , 2019, p. 625-636Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In recent years, ideas related to digitalization have gained significance on the contemporary transport policy agenda. Based on discourse analysis of the digitalization agenda in Swedish transport policy, this paper investigates the ongoing formative phase of the emerging policy and planning area of digitalization and smart mobility. It examines and critically discusses the current discursive framing of digitalization in current transport policy and planning, and considers perspectives and meanings related to "smart" mobility and accessibility that are being established in strategic plans and policies for the Swedish transport sector. The empirical focus is on transport strategies and official reports developed at national level. The main findings indicate that digitalization is being framed as a rapid, unstoppable transformation process, which will lead to a range of positive outcomes such as reduced climate emissions, less congestion, improved accessibility, and a smoother and more resource-efficient transport system. According to the ideas and assumptions promoted in the current discourse, this transformation can only occur through stronger involvement of business enterprises. This governing strategy, or lack of governing strategy, makes it unclear how transport policy objectives are balanced against market and innovation interests. It also risks delegating the transition to sustainable mobility to less formalized and less transparent policy arenas that operate in parallel to, and partly outside, established planning and strategy-making processes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2019. p. 625-636
Keywords [en]
digitalization, discourse, smart accessibility, smart mobility, sustainable transport, transition, transport policy
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-16070DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.112ISI: 000579834300102Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85080934198OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-16070DiVA, id: diva2:1536919
Conference
International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport Urban Mobility ? Shaping the Future Together mobil.TUM 2018, 13 June 2018 through 14 June 2018
Available from: 2020-06-09 Created: 2021-03-12 Last updated: 2025-09-11Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Approaching transformative futures: Discourse and practice in Swedish national transport policy and planning
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Approaching transformative futures: Discourse and practice in Swedish national transport policy and planning
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis concerns the need to transform the transport system to meet climate mitigation objectives. It provides insights into how specific approaches and practices in transport policy and planning affect prospects for transformation. It focuses on specific practices and knowledge perspectives in policy and planning, exploration of future uncertainty, and the scope and agency attributed to planning for influencing the future development of the transport system. The empirical interest is directed towards contemporary Swedish national transport policy and planning, analyzed in four articles: organization and procurement of physical planning of road and rail investments (Article 1), an emerging discursive framing of digitalized, 'smart' accessibility (Article 2), the approach to future uncertainty in the national investment plan for transport infrastructure 2018-2029 (Article 3), and an inter-agency collaboration on a plan for a fossil-free transformation of the transport system (Article 4).

The thesis follows a qualitative research approach based on a social constructivist and poststructuralist understanding of knowledge as socially constructed and sustained. To highlight the influence of practice and knowledge perspectives on understandings of the future development of the transport system and conditions for transformation, a Foucauldian discursive approach is applied. This approach emphasizes reciprocal dependency between discourse and practice.

Results make evident that Swedish national transport planning and policy is largely characterized by a ‘conventional’ approach with dominant quantitative practices and knowledge perspectives, through which the future is mainly portrayed as a continuation of the historical development. The studies show that this approach strongly influence how the transport system and prospects for transformation are understood and described. The thesis illustrates tendencies to avoid issues of future uncertainty, and how this is taken as an argument for not exploring alternative development directions. Consequently, opportunities to influence future development are portrayed as limited. This has a restrictive effect on the conditions for transformation. However, the thesis also shows contexts where future uncertainty is considered as a basic planning condition, which justifies exploration of opportunities for transformation by broader practices and knowledge perspectives.

Overall, the thesis makes visible ways in which specific practices and knowledge perspectives exert significant influence over which choices regarding future pathways that are presented to the public and decision makers. A central conclusion regards a need for a more politically oriented discussion on what knowledge and practices in transport policy and practice that are relevant and fit for purpose in the light of the climate mitigation challenge as well as other societal objectives.

Abstract [sv]

Denna avhandling tar sin utgångspunkt i behovet av omställning av transportsystemet för att möta politiskt uppställda klimatmål. Den bidrar med insikter om hur specifika förhållningssätt och praktiker i policy och planering inom transportområdet påverkar förutsättningar för omställning. Fokus riktas mot specifika praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv, hur aspekter av framtida osäkerhet i utvecklingen hanteras, och vilken roll som planering antas kunna spela i den framtida utvecklingen av transportsystemet. Avhandlingens empiriska intresse riktas mot samtida svensk nationell transportpolicy och -planering, som analyseras genom fyra delstudier: organisering och upphandling av fysisk planering av väg och järnväg (artikel 1), en framväxande diskursiv förståelse av digitaliserad, ’smart’ tillgänglighet (artikel 2), förhållningssätt till framtida osäkerhet i Nationell plan för transportsystemet 2018-2029 (artikel 3), samt ett myndighetsgemensamt utarbetande av en plan för omställning av transportsystemet till fossilfrihet, populärt benämnt SOFT (artikel 4).

Avhandlingen följer en kvalitativ forskningsansats grundad i en socialkonstruktivistisk och poststrukturalistisk syn på kunskap som socialt konstruerad och upprätthållen. För att belysa praktikers och kunskapsperspektivs inflytande över förståelser av transportsystemets framtida utveckling och förutsättningar för omställning tillämpas en Foucauldiansk diskursiv ansats. Denna ansats betonar ett ömsesidigt beroende mellan diskurs och praktik.

Resultaten visar att svensk nationell transportplanering och policy i hög grad präglas av ett så kallat ’konventionellt’ förhållningssätt till transportsystemet, med dominerande kvantitativa praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv genom vilka framtiden i huvudsak framställs som en fortsättning på den historiska utvecklingen. Studierna i avhandlingen visar att detta förhållningssätt får stort inflytande över hur transportsystemet och förutsättningar för omställning förstås och beskrivs. Avhandlingen visar på tendenser att undvika osäkerhet om framtiden, och hur detta tas som argument för att inte utforska alternativa utvecklingsriktningar och anspråk på framtiden. En konsekvens är att möjligheter att påverka utvecklingen framställs som begränsade. Avhandlingen visar dock också på sammanhang där framtida osäkerhet beaktas som en grundläggande planeringsförutsättning, vilket motiverar utforskande av möjligheter till omställning utifrån bredare praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv.

Sammantaget synliggör avhandlingen att specifika praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv har betydande inflytande över vilka vägval kring transportsystemets framtid som presenteras för allmänheten och beslutsfattare. En slutsats är att detta inflytande, i kombination med de kontrasterande praktiker och kunskapsperspektiv som präglar olika planeringssammanhang, motiverar en tydligare politiskt orienterad diskussion om vilken kunskap som är relevant i ljuset av uppställda samhällsmål, och vad som utgör relevant praktik i relation till det.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, 2021. p. 72
Keywords
transport planning, transport infrastructure, climate mitigation, transformation, planning practice, uncertainty, assessment
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Planning and Decision Analysis, Urban and Regional Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-16069 (URN)9789178737543 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-01-29, För videolänk registrera er hos / For videolink register at https://kth-se.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_eghJol1zToaRI-2HiP4d7w, Du som saknar dator/datorvana kan kontakta kis@kth.se / Use the e-mail address if you need technical assistance, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-03-12 Created: 2021-03-12 Last updated: 2025-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Henriksson, MalinWitzell, JacobIsaksson, Karolina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Henriksson, MalinWitzell, JacobIsaksson, Karolina
By organisation
Mobility, actors and planning processes
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 209 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf