Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Costs and benefits of e-roads versus battery trucks: Uncertainty and coordination
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Society, environment and transport, Transport economics. Linköping University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9235-0232
KU Leuven, Belgium.
2025 (English)In: Resources and Energy Economics, ISSN 0928-7655, E-ISSN 1873-0221, Vol. 82, article id 101492Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The EU aims to achieve climate neutrality for trucks. This paper compares the user cost of diesel trucks, battery electric trucks, and trucks that rely on overhead lines in a decision context where the developments of battery costs and overhead line investment and maintenance costs are uncertain. The user costs contain the truck capital cost and the energy costs, the possible vehicle-to-grid benefits, driver costs, and other distance costs. User costs are compared for different distance profiles and optimized battery sizes. The possible user cost developments serve as input to an analysis of investment decisions in electric motorways (e-roads). The economics of e-roads is analyzed for two representations of the EU TEN-T network. In the first analysis, average EU truck flow (veh/h) and truck trip characteristics are used. In the second representation, we consider domestic and international truck transport between two neighbouring countries with strongly diverging average traffic flows and shares of international truck trips on their TEN-T network. This allows for the analysis of the non-cooperative and cooperative solutions of the two countries. The installation of e-roads appears to be a robust investment decision for the motorways of large countries that have dense truck traffic but not for less dense countries. Cooperation between countries may increase total benefits due to economies of scale.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 82, article id 101492
Keywords [en]
Battery development, Catenary trucks, CBA, Coordination of investments, Electric roads, Electric trucks
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-21726DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101492ISI: 001434204300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217732175OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-21726DiVA, id: diva2:1941537
Funder
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, GD-2021-0002Available from: 2025-02-28 Created: 2025-02-28 Last updated: 2025-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Börjesson, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Börjesson, Maria
By organisation
Transport economics
In the same journal
Resources and Energy Economics
Transport Systems and LogisticsEconomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 336 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf