Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of uncertainty on Shore hardness measurements of tyre treads and implications to tyre/road noise measurements with the Close Proximity method
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Society, environment and transport, Environment.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8057-6031
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Society, environment and transport, Environment.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0138-0768
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Infrastructure, Infrastructure maintenance.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5306-2753
2020 (English)In: Measurement, ISSN 0263-2241, E-ISSN 1873-412X, Vol. 162, article id 107882Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Shore hardness measurements subject rubber bodies to standardized indentations. While easily performed, the measurements are subject to uncertainties. Although typical variances for Shore hardness are found in standards, operator and instrument effects are not well described, requiring statistically designed experiments to estimate effects and variance components. This paper focuses on uncertainty in Shore A hardness measurements of tyre tread elements and quantifies operator and instrument effects. Evaluation of uncertainty of Shore A measurements were performed on tyres under controlled conditions using three instruments, two tyres and five operators. Results show that the operator variance component and instrument effects are larger than the reference variance contribution in ISO 11819-3:2017. The interaction between operator and instrument is estimated to be the largest source of variation, while operator and instrument main effects are of similar size as the error component. Recommendations to reduce uncertainties include ignoring instantaneous values and requiring an instrument stand. © 2020 The Author(s)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , 2020. Vol. 162, article id 107882
National Category
Vehicle Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-15283DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107882Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85084605841OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-15283DiVA, id: diva2:1433391
Available from: 2020-05-29 Created: 2020-05-29 Last updated: 2022-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1288 kB)220 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1288 kBChecksum SHA-512
e8527d97e338487095a43af9498d72813d5673d7927ff1aad936265d109d49fc46ed974223ab9e51955e2b668853733ec5ec97e12fb13e9104a1594011de3326
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vieira, TiagoLundberg, JoacimEriksson, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vieira, TiagoLundberg, JoacimEriksson, Olle
By organisation
EnvironmentInfrastructure maintenance
In the same journal
Measurement
Vehicle Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 221 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 390 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf