Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies are often used for assessing environmental effects that e.g. certain types of infrastructure investments might have during their lifetime. In Sweden the development of electric roads has reached a level where a full-scale implementation is assumed during the coming decade. The goal is to find solutions for fossil free transportation and electric roads is an important part of this. Three different concepts of electrified roads are currently discussed in Sweden; the overhead catenary, the rail in the road surface and the inductive transfer from beneath the road surface.
Since electric road is such a new type of concept there are very few LCA-studies focusing on this type of infrastructure, and only one of the reviewed studies were comparing between all three concepts of electric roads.
The lifecycle of the road consists of the building and construction of the road, the maintenance and operations, the user phase and the end of life of the road. Electric roads are planned to be installed in already existing road infrastructure, hence different kind of electric road concepts will affect the roads in different ways depending on if the technique is to be buried, surface flush, or in the side area of the road.
Different concept will also need different types of maintenance and operations. LCA studies on the environmental effects of roads show that the largest emissions of CO2 come from the maintenance and operations part of the road’s lifetime, if not considering the user phase. It will hence be crucial to investigate how maintenance will be affected by different types of electric road concepts.
Comparative LCA studies show that there is little difference between the environmental impact during the installation phase between roads and railroads. An installation of electric roads in an existing road is, however, an additional component in the environmental footprint of the road compared to the railroad, since additional technique will be installed in the road or roadside area. Meaning that an electric road will have a larger impact on the environment than a regular road during the installation phase. During the lifetime of the road this investment will, however, be paid back during the user phase of the road. Some of the LCA studies does, however, show that it will, depending on type of electric road concept, take several decades to pay back the investments of such a system. They also warn about investing in such a concept before all aspects are completely explored, as there is a risk that other techniques such as fast chargers will catch-up, making expensive road installations unnecessary.
The LCA study that compared between different concepts of electric roads has also included the reduced amout of asphalt that is needed for the road installed technologies. There are, however, some assumptions regarding maintenance and operations, made in the study that could be questioned. The few studies that are specifically investigating LCA on different kinds of electric road concepts, show that there is a lack of information and knowledge that is needed to be able to make viable assessments. These studies have furthermore not included the new types of technologies that are currently being installed during the two new demonstration projects for electrified roads in Sweden. One, in which the rail is placed on top of the asphalt minimizing the impact of the road construction by not needing to excavate the road surface, and the other one which is a new more flexible type of inductive technology, which also might reduce the impact of the road construction.