Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Tactical driving behaviour with different levels of automation
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Traffic and road users, Human-vehicle-transport system interaction.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1849-9722
Lunds Universitet.
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Traffic and road users, Vehicle technology and simulation.
2014 (English)In: IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems (Print), ISSN 1524-9050, E-ISSN 1558-0016, Vol. 15, no 1, 158-167 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper investigated how different types of automation affect tactical driving behavior, depending on trust in the system. Previous research indicates that drivers wait for automation to act, delegating the monitoring of traffic situations. This would be especially true for those who have more trust in automation. Behavioral and gaze data from 30 participants driving an advanced simulator were recorded in four driving conditions, namely, manual driving, intentional car following, adaptive cruise control (ACC), and ACC with adaptive steering. Measures of trust in the systems were recorded with a questionnaire.

Three fairly common traffic events requiring a driver response were analyzed. Trust in automation was high among the participants, and no associations between trust levels and behavior could be found. Drivers seem to make informed choices on when to let the automation handle a situation and when to switch it off manually or via the vehicle controls. If drivers did not expect the system to be able to handle the situation, they usually resumed control before the automation reached its limits. If the automation was expected to be able to deal with the situation, control was usually not resumed. In addition, situations were dealt with in a tactically different manner with automation than without. Controlling the car with automation systems is thus accepted by drivers as being a different undertaking than driving in manual mode.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 15, no 1, 158-167 p.
Keyword [en]
Driver assistance system, Driver, Acceptability, Attitude (psychol), Simulator (driving), Driver, Behaviour, Eye movement
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Research subject
80 Road: Traffic safety and accidents, 841 Road: Road user behaviour; 90 Road: Vehicles and vehicle technology, 914 Road: ITS och vehicle technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-7904DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2277725ISI: 000331292300015ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84894048800OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-7904DiVA: diva2:814902
Available from: 2015-05-28 Created: 2015-05-28 Last updated: 2016-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kircher, KatjaAndersson Hultgren, Jonas
By organisation
Human-vehicle-transport system interactionVehicle technology and simulation
In the same journal
IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems (Print)
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf