Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of Nonresponse and Weighting in a Swedish Survey
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4680-4795
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5198-8851
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9164-9221
2007 (English)In: Transportation Research Record, ISSN 0361-1981, E-ISSN 2169-4052, no 1993, 80-88 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Results from travel surveys, together with traffic monitoring programs, serve as a basis for policy decisions and evaluations. Correct interpretation of the survey results is therefore of vital importance, and the impact of different sources of error needs to be investigated. This paper presents a study of nonresponse errors in a Swedish travel survey. Survey methodologists have addressed the problem of nonresponse for a long time, and several methods have been developed to reduce possible bias. Particularly common are different weighting methods based on auxiliary information. However, the performance of these techniques is based on how well the chosen auxiliary variables can explain the response behavior. The aims of the present study were to (a) investigate whether the mobility of nonrespondents differs from the mobility of respondents and (b) determine whether weighting reduces possible nonresponse bias. A weighting technique called calibration was used. The travel survey was based on a mail questionnaire, and the response rate was about 53%. Nonrespondents were contacted by telephone and asked a selected number of questions from the original questionnaire. Results show that mobility did differ between respondents and nonrespondents for some of the travel modes. The effect of calibration was generally small and inconsistent; the bias was reduced in some cases and increased in others. Nevertheless, calibration is recommended if procedures for calculating the weights are readily available.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Washington DC: Transportation Research Board , 2007. no 1993, 80-88 p.
Keyword [en]
Household, Journey, Behaviour, Method, Calculation, Correction, Traffic survey
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
10 Road: Transport, society, policy and planning, 11 Road: Personal transport
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-7119ISI: 000252682800011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-38349016584OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-7119DiVA: diva2:747574
Available from: 2014-09-17 Created: 2014-09-17 Last updated: 2016-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Scopuspdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsman, ÅsaGustafsson, SusanneVadeby, Anna
By organisation
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute
In the same journal
Transportation Research Record
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf