Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transport mobility 5 years after stroke in an urban setting
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8633-3292
Mobilitetscenter, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8026-5591
2018 (English)In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, ISSN 1074-9357, E-ISSN 1945-5119, Vol. 25, no 3, p. 180-185Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: People after stroke may have residual problems with mobility that can affect their independence and mode of transport. However, there is limited knowledge about transport mobility several years after stroke.

Objective: The objective was to survey the outdoor mobility and transportation in an urban setting five years post-stroke.

Method: This cross-sectional study was based on a mail survey focusing on long-term consequences after stroke. The survey comprises a set of self-evaluated questionnaires and was sent to 457 persons, of whom 281 responded (61.5%). From the survey, items regarding transportation and mobility were selected and analyzed.

Results: A high level of mobility function was reported with regard to outdoor mobility and different modes of transport. However, one-fifth still reported problems with outdoor mobility and mode of transport. Some perceived barriers were reported, predominantly mobility aspects such as transfer to/from, and getting on/off specific transportation mode/s. The respondents reported some communication problems and cognitive impairments, but these were not reported as prominent barriers when using public transport. A total of 67% were active drivers and were more often men (p = 0.002), younger (p <= 0.001), and were less dependent at discharge from the acute hospital (p <= 0.001).

Conclusions: Five years post-stroke, mobility problems were the dominant barrier reported when using transport modes. Individualized transport training is needed during rehabilitation to increase possibility to participate. Infrastructure and transportation planning should focus on older, women, and people with impairments to be able to facilitate the use of public transport and mobility.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 25, no 3, p. 180-185
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-18126DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1419619ISI: 000428840700004PubMedID: 29334331Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85052105079OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-18126DiVA, id: diva2:1642995
Funder
The Swedish Brain FoundationPromobilia foundationAvailable from: 2022-03-08 Created: 2022-03-08 Last updated: 2022-03-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Selander, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, Hanna C.Selander, Helena
In the same journal
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Occupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf