Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analysis of safety impact of freeway designs using data mining techniques
University of Central Florida.
University of Central Florida.
2018 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) was developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) and published in 2010 to introduce a science-based technical approach for safety analysis. The HSM provides analytical methods to quantify the safety effects of decisions and treatments in planning, design, operation, and maintenance. One of the main parts in the HSM, Part D, contains crash modification factors (CMFs) for various treatments on roadway segments and at intersections. Generally, a CMF represents the overall safety performance of specific treatment. Although the first edition of HSM provides various CMFs for rural roadways and urban arterials, but there are a lack of CMFs for freeways in the HSM.

According to the HSM, a CMF can be estimated by the observational before-after studies and cross-sectional method. Observational before-after studies are well known approaches for evaluating safety effectiveness and calculating CMFs of specific roadway treatments. Moreover, the cross-sectional method has been commonly applied to derive CMFs due to the ease with which data can be obtained compared to the before-after approaches. In order to estimate the CMF using the cross-sectional method, development of safety performance functions (SPFs) or crash prediction models (CPMs) is required. Due to its strength of accounting for over-dispersion, the generalized linear regression with negative binomial (NB) distribution has been widely used to develop SPFs. In the cross-sectional method, the CMF can be calculated from the coefficient of the variable associated with specific treatment of the SPF. However, the estimated CMFs from generalized linear regression model (GLM) cannot account for the nonlinear effect of the treatment since the coefficients in the GLM are assumed to be fixed.

Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the safety effects of multiple roadway cross-section design elements on freeways in development of CMFs using data mining approaches. In order to account for both nonlinear effects and interaction impacts between variables, two promising data mining techniques, the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and the generalized additive models (GAM), were applied in this study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut, 2018.
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Research subject
X RSXC
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-12920OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-12920DiVA, id: diva2:1204062
Conference
18th International Conference Road Safety on Five Continents (RS5C 2018), Jeju Island, South Korea, May 16-18, 2018
Available from: 2018-05-16 Created: 2018-05-06 Last updated: 2018-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(137 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 137 kBChecksum SHA-512
7a15a5a712e187a93821d1c5d360f930a0ad16976c76997cf46411347983617a07ce49208f2ab0e5dfc37f9de9574a75f3b1e72413ac9b02167c24d518d37ea4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Infrastructure Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 20 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 222 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf