Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Tourism development strategy or just brown signage?: Comparing road administration policies and designation procedures for official tourism routes in two Scandinavian countries
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Society, environment and transport, Mobility, actors and planning processes.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7828-3640
University of Stavanger.
2014 (English)In: Land use policy, ISSN 0264-8377, E-ISSN 1873-5754, Vol. 36, 342-350 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

This comparative study maps and explores planning and designation of official tourism, routes in two countries with quite similar planning traditions, responding to a deficiency in research, on tourism route planning and development.

Based on personal semi-structured interviews with, public road planners and managers in Norway and Sweden, the paper illuminates establishment and, management of official tourism routes, with an emphasis on overall strategies, funding, and, stakeholder involvement.

Results show that public road administration route planning procedures in, the two countries are quite different. In Norway, a top-down principle is basically employed, concerning initiatives and designation of routes.

In Sweden, the principle is one of muddling through, giving street-level planners more opportunities for individual influence on route planning. Funding for, road stretches included in the Norwegian national route programme is earmarked, whereas Swedish, routes are financed from ordinary appropriations to the regional road administrations.

In Norway, regular follow-up studies such as road user surveys are conducted. In Sweden, a dearth of, documentation of tourist interests and route assessments seemingly makes route development, susceptible in relation to regional road administrations' economic priorities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 36, 342-350 p.
Keyword [en]
Tourism, Interview, Planning, Transport authority, Route (itinerary), Sweden, Norway, Financing
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Research subject
10 Road: Transport, society, policy and planning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-9356DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.003ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84884538717OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-9356DiVA: diva2:1047365
Available from: 2016-11-17 Created: 2016-03-02 Last updated: 2016-11-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Antonson, Hans
By organisation
Mobility, actors and planning processes
In the same journal
Land use policy
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 32 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf